1896 - Report on State Forests of Victoria
Introduction by Ian Hastings (bio)
Source : Indian Forestry through the Ages, SS Negi (1994)
Read the Complete Report
In 1895, B Rippentrop, then Inspector-General of Forests to the Government of India, was requested by The Hon RW Best, Minister of Lands, Victoria, to prepare this Report. It is reasonable to surmise that this, and previous reports by Perrin in 1890 and Vincent in 1887, reflected the ongoing and increasing concern about the poor condition, regulation and management of many areas of Victorian forest on Crown Land, despite attempts to initiate strong management, arising from:
- the widespread uncontrolled felling of trees associated with the Victorian gold rush period
- continuing poorly-controlled timber harvesting
- increasing instances of illegal occupation of Crown Land
- pressures for alienation of Crown Land areas
Ribbentrop's Report includes several very strong assertions, criticisms, points and recommendations relating to the issues and challenges, in particular about addressing the priorities and interactions between:
- the role of Government and need for proper governance
- the public-community asset, good and welfare of State Forests, and
- the politics of the time and its role, influence and interference
Many of Ribbentrop's assertions, criticisms, points and recommendations in 1896 remain as salient and appropriate messages and reminders for future managers of Victoria's public-owned native forests and plantation land, irrespective of land tenure.
To encourage you to read the complete document, I have precised and highlighted a few of it's challenging findings and assertions:-
* p3 - "I also found .... that it was widely acknowledged that the permanent conservation of a sufficient forest area was, and always would would be, an important factor in the welfare and prosperity of the colony."
* p3 - (in 1896) .... "State forest conservancy and management are in an extraordinary backward state .... The forest laws of the country are inadequate ..... The area of inalienable State forest has not been increased since Mr Vincent's report of 1887 .... The protection of forests against fires has never ever been attempted, and neglect and waste in their treatment are now as rampant .... The income from the forests is ridiculously small, and quite out of proportion to the large supplies drawn from them; and the money spent on their protection, maintenance and improvement is entirely inadequate."
* p3 - "The reasons for the self-evident mismanagement of the forest property of the country are ..... political, and centre in the public weal (ie the public good, the welfare of a country or community) where this clashes with the monetary profits of individuals or classes who can exert a direct Parliamentary influence."
Read on (my highlighting); .... p4 "remove the management of State Forests from the whirlpool of party politics" .... p4 six fundamentals, principles and objectives for forest management legislation ... p5 "it will be necessary to frame a pre-considered working plan for each forest unit" .... p7 the challenge of managing forest for both water supply, "permanent canopy" and timber products .... p8 Ribbentrop's thoughts on establishing plantations of exotic tree species .... "The broadcast introduction of Pinus insignis ... its' wood is of low character"-- what would he make of Victoria's current softwood plantation estate of primarily P radiata (syn P insignis)?
Foresters of the Raj, Underwood R (2013) - extract with permission.